Improving adherence to guidelines for hypertension drug prescribing: cluster-randomized controlled trial of general versus patient-specific recommendations.

Am J Manag Care. 2005 Nov;11(11):677-85

Authors: Goldstein MK, Lavori P, Coleman R, Advani A, Hoffman BB

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an intervention focusing clinician attention on drug choice for hypertension treatment improves concordance between drug regimens and guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: Cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing an individualized intervention with a general guideline implementation in geographically diverse primary care clinics of a university-affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system. METHODS: Participants were 36 attending physicians and nurse practitioners (16 in the general group and 20 in the individualized group), with findings based on 4500 hypertensive patients. A general guideline implementation for all clinicians, including education about guideline-based drug recommendations and goals for adequacy of blood pressure control, was compared with addition of a printed individualized advisory sent to clinicians at each patient visit, indicating whether or not the patient’s antihypertensive drug regimen was guideline concordant. We measured change from baseline to end point in the proportion of clinicians’ patients whose drug therapy was guideline concordant. RESULTS: The individualized intervention resulted in an improvement in guideline concordance more than twice that observed for the general intervention (10.9% vs 3.8%, t = 2.796, P = .008). Bootstrap analysis showed that being in the individualized group increased the odds of concordance 1.5-fold (P = .025). The proportion of patients with adequate blood pressure control increased within each study group; however, the difference between groups was not significant. CONCLUSION: An individualized advisory regarding drug therapy for hypertension given to the clinician at each patient visit was more effective in changing clinician prescribing behavior than implementation of a general guideline.

PMID: 16268751 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

]]>

Related ArticlesBarriers to success for an evidence-based guideline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chron Respir Dis. 2005;2(3):121-31

Authors: Smith BJ, Dalziel K, McElroy HJ, Ruffin RE, Frith PA, McCaul KA, Cheok F

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate 1) barriers to clinical guideline use and 2) the relationship between guideline use and inpatient outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: 1) Four focus groups of specific health professions (n = 30), from three metropolitan hospitals, and interview of 99 medical officers (MOs), linked to 349 admissions, both guided by behavioural modelling theory; 2) association between guideline use and patient outcomes (length of hospital stay > or = 14 days, and readmission within 28 or 90 days) was evaluated in a cohort of 405 COPD patients. RESULTS: 1) In focus groups, nurses and allied health professionals emphasized facilitation issues including paperwork duplication and time limitations as barriers, but considered improved patient care outcomes as the major guideline use determinant. There were similar findings in junior MOs (nonconsultants) by both focus group and interview, with the addition of a need for a sense of ownership. Senior MOs (consultants) greatly emphasized sense of ownership. Barriers to guideline use varied between types of units. Behavioural modelling explained 49% of the variation in intention to use the guideline for MOs. For nonconsultants, habit and intention were significantly associated with extent of guideline use. 2) Patient outcomes: guideline use was not associated with length of stay or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Guideline implementation should address issues relevant to different health professions, units and seniority of profession. 2) Guideline use was not associated with reductions in readmission or length of stay.

PMID: 16281435 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

]]>